| [1] |
Cf. Otchyot I<mperatorskoy>Arkheolog<icheskoy> Kom<missii> za 1891 g. [1891 Report of the Imperial Archaeological Commission], p. 5, fig. 2. — Two scraps of the mentioned cloth are depicted in Izv<estiya> I<mperatorskoy> Arkh<eologicheskoy>Kom<missii> [Proceedings of the Imperial Archaeological Commission] 16, p. 38, figs. 1 and 2. |
| [2] |
For the detailed list of these artifacts see K.K.Kostsyushko-Valyuzhinich’s report in Izv<estiya> I<mperatorskoy> Arkh<eologicheskoy> Kom<missii> [Proceedings of the Imperial Archaeological Commission] 16, p. 39 ff. |
| [3] |
Published by V.V.Latyshev in Izv<estiya> I<mperatorskoy> Arkh<eologicheskoy> Kom<missii> [Proceedings of the Imperial Archaeological Commission] 14, p. 102, cat. no. 11. |
| [4] |
Cf. Izv<estiya> I<mperatorskoy> Arkh<eologicheskoy> Kom<missii> [Proceedings of the Imperial Archaeological Commission] 2, p. 22, fig. 22. |
| [5] |
For the detailed description of the finds see K.K.Kostsyushko-Valyuzhinich’s report in Izv<estiya> I<mperatorskoy> Arkh<eologicheskoy> Kom<missii> [Proceedings of the Imperial Archaeological Commission] 16, p. 45. |
| [6] |
Сf. Izv<estiya> I<mperatorskoy> Arkh<eologicheskoy> Kom<missii> [Proceedings of the Imperial Archaeological Commission] 2, p. 1 ff., fig. 1-3. |
| [7] |
Сf. Izv<estiya> I<mperatorskoy> Arkh<eologicheskoy> Kom<missii> [Proceedings of the Imperial Archaeological Commission] 9, p. 61, fig. 37. |
| [8] |
Izv<estiya> I<mperatorskoy> Arkh<eologicheskoy> Kom<missii> [Proceedings of the Imperial Archaeological Commission] 16, p. 56 ff. |
| [9] |
Published in Izv<estiya> I<mperatorskoy> Arkh<eologicheskoy> Kom<missii> [Proceedings of the Imperial Archaeological Commission], vols. 10, 14 and 16. |
| [10] |
For the details see K.K.Kostsyushko-Valyuzhinich’s article cited above, p. 67 ff. |
| [11] |
See Izv<estiya> I<mperatorskoy> Arkh<eologicheskoy> Kom<missii> [Proceedings of the Imperial Archaeological Commission] 16, p. 80, figs. 37а and 37б. The excavations have revealed broken stand; it is quite probable that these figures shows the stand’s hook incorrectly: it should enter it from above. |
| [12] |
For the attributions see the article mentioned above, p. 59 ff. |
| [13] |
See Otchyot I<mperatorskoy>Arkheolog<icheskoy> Kom<missii> za 1891 g. [1891 Report of the Imperial Archaeological Commission], p. 147, fig. 182. |
| [14] |
Cf. Otchyot I<mperatorskoy>Arkheolog<icheskoy> Kom<missii> za 1896 g. [1896 Report of the Imperial Archaeological Commission], p. 176, and 1898 Report, p. 119. |
| [15] |
Cf. the artifact excavated in 1893 from grave no. 338. |
| [16] |
Cf. the form of the latter with the item published by bar. de Baye, La bijouterie des Goths en Russie, p. 2, on the left (from Kerch). |
| [17] |
Cf. Izv<estiya> I<mperatorskoy> Arkh<eologicheskoy> Kom<missii> [Proceedings of the Imperial Archaeological Commission] 4, p. 86, fig. 86. |
| [18] |
For the attributions see K.K.Kostsyushko-Valyuzhinich, op. cit., p. 87 ff. |
| [19] |
Cf. Izvestiya I<mperatorskoy> Arkh<eologicheskoy> Kom<missii> [Proceedings of the Imperial Archaeological Commission] 4, p. 109. |
| [20] |
Cf. 1898 Otchyot <ImperatorskoyArkheologicheskoy Kommissii> [The Imperial Archaeological Commission’s report], p. 119, fig. 20. |
